Archive for the ‘Seminar’ Category

The National Photography Symposium, Manchester, 19-21 June 2009

Monday, July 27th, 2009

“If your photographs are not good enough you are probably not reading enough.”
Tod Papageorge

Red Eye

Chetham’s Library and Museum in Manchester, the oldest public library in the English-speaking world, hosted the first National Photography Symposium organised by Redeye, The Photography Network, in partnership with the University of Bolton, in June 2009.

The event held in this unique medieval venue instead of the somewhat cold and sterile alternative of a modern conference centre and opened with a truly inspiring performance on the subject of “the marriage of words and images” by the poet Ian MacMillan metaphorically suggested a parallel between various public creative languages including literature, poetry, music, photography, etc.  The idea that as photographers and facilitators we should look outside our own practice resonated consistently throughout the Symposium.

Medieval Venue

To say that Francis Hodgson, a photography critic for the Financial Times, and the former Head of Photographs at Sotheby’s, London, expressed dissatisfaction with the current position of photography in Britain would be an understatement. In his keynote speech he combined anger and passion in his exploration of everything that is historically and culturally wrong with the way photography – in his view the most important medium of today – is currently represented in the UK.

His arguments include the lack of general appreciation and the most basic cultural framework that is standard in France, Germany and certainly the US, among others, the absence of serious analysis and discussion of the “not quite proper art form” in the British press and on TV, combined with the loss of the London Photo Fair and the enormous number of unemployable people, “illiterate in their own art form,” produced by photography courses each year. He shared some rather depressing figures (for example, the ratio between the number of pop and opera correspondents and the number of photography correspondents, if any) which demonstrate that photography is currently very far from reaching the level of cultural manifestation it deserves.

Needless to say that this angry and intellectually engaging presentation made quite an impact on the audience, and it would be fascinating to see such sharp minds focus on the future and the ways of altering, if not revolutionising, current thinking about photography at the next Symposium.

Miranda Gavin, Deputy and Online Editor of the bimonthly contemporary photography magazine HotShoe, gave a memorable presentation on the dynamics and pressures of magazine publishing versus publishing on demand, blogging and other forms of online communities. She raised a number of crucial questions, answers to which will probably determine the development of print magazine publishing and the online environment in the future. The advantages of being able to reach bigger audiences online through blogs and forums are indisputable but it’s a whole other landscape that brings all sorts of additional colours and presents a new set of challenges: “…What about arbitrators of taste? How democratic is it? Do we want to have peer-reviewed exhibitions? What about a photograph and a magazine being an object? What about the idea of an emerging artist being discovered, do photographers get discovered online in the same way? What about the kudos of having your work published in a print magazine? How do we feel about digitalisation and the copyright responsibility that comes with it?…”

In her talk Miranda Gavin gave visibility to issues that cannot be ignored and echoed presentations by other speakers like David Brittain, the former editor of Creative Camera, who explored the idea of magazine art, a relationship between image makers and editors and how technology is forcing print to adapt; and Paul Herrmann, the director of Redeye who offered his vision of the successful 21st century photographer which almost inevitably includes being a part of an international virtual circle, as well as complimentary range of work as a result of a broad interest in the world.

Other topics discussed include the global overview of the photography market and how it was born and developed in The Art Market and Collectors by Jeffrey Boloten and Francis Hodgson;  photography festivals as an interruption of the everyday,  their agendas and geographical landscape in The Photography Festivals by Louise Clements, Yasmina Reggad, James McVeigh and Patrick Henry as well as numerous other sessions like Photography in the Press; Photographers, the Police, Security and Privacy; The Collective and the Library; Copyright; Political Activism; Documenting the Socially Excluded, etc and keynotes by a multiple award winning Magnum photographer Chris Steele-Perkins and the influential contemporary artist and filmmaker Hannah Collins.

Many sessions overlapped, allowing attendees to follow their own customised schedule and make the best use of their time, but this was at the cost of almost segregating what started out as a diverse mix of people that is so essential for creating a dialogue.

Whether the National Photography Symposium takes a radical format for creating a battle of ideas and becomes a regular major event in the British calendar remains to be seen, but its ambition is simply brilliant, so it is my hope that the event gets deserved recognition for its relevance to both practitioners and facilitators.

Alina Kisina

Alina is a self-taught Ukranian photographer who trained as a linguist. Her solo show ‘Zerkalo : Mirror’ was shown at the Scotland-Russia Institute in Edinburgh in December 2008 to January 2009.

Photography and The City

Monday, May 4th, 2009

Stills Gallery, Edinburgh, 6th March 2009.

This event was advertised as a discussion that would explore the themes of photography and the city through distinct perspectives.  Indeed, Alex Law, Duncan Forbes and Francis McKee approached the subject from three very different points of enquiry.

Alex Law began the discussion by offering us a look at 20th Century social theory through the work of Walter Benjamin, Henri Lefebvre and Georg Simmel.  His paper was insightful, and surprisingly more relevant to photography than I had anticipated.

Law discussed Simmel’s The Metropolis and Mental Life (1903) and how the urban environment has transformed our personality over the years through the adjustments the city imposes on people.  His talk covered broad themes, including the visual imagination of the city, the bombardment of our senses, the dialectic of the city, the domestication of the street and more generally, modernism and modernity.

Law outlined the inherent tensions between commodity production and people’s values and individuality.  He touched upon Marx to illustrate that to make sense of history, we must leave the world of surface appearances and ideology and instead examine the material realities of labour and the dissemination and control of information if we are to obtain the ‘truth’. Importantly, Law discussed the idea that experience itself is becoming devalued, and that many thinkers (from Simmel to Adorno) believed that Art is the solution to the rescue humanity from experience.

Benjamin was one of these thinkers who saw art positively.  For example Benjamin argued that with advances in technology such as photography, there is increased scope for human agency in the creation of art works.  Yet in many ways this put him at odds with the pessimism of Adorno’s critique of the culture industry, and its standardisation of the production of art works.

Duncan Forbes went to offer us a reengagement with the history of photography.  He focused on picturesque Edinburgh, the politics of the structural nostalgia and the romantic imagery this enforces.  He outlined that in the 1820s there was an explosion of images of the city. Edinburgh was emerging as a ‘spectacular city’, and according to Forbes this ‘spectacular’ had a dramatic effect on social relations.

Forbes described the arrival of the camera as a revolutionary instrument.  Through an intriguing slideshow of photographic calotypes we were offered a very different view and representation of Edinburgh compared to the romantic paintings we had seen previously.  We looked at the work of Hill and Adamson, who (I had not realised) had paid particular attention to Edinburgh’s architecture.  In fact, Forbes informed us that Hill was actually a very political figure who was part of a massive attempt to reclaim art from the aristocracy.

Figure 1

Figure 1: Edinburgh’s Scott Monument Under Construction, c1844David Octavius Hill and Robert Adamson.

Through this new photographic documentation of Edinburgh’s architecture, the city was being actively monumentalised.  Edinburgh was transforming rapidly.  Capitalism was now firmly entrenched as the dominant system of production, and thus changes within the local environment were inevitable: urban demolitions were common. In turn, the increasing rationalisation of modernity, as famously depicted by Max Weber, became entrenched in photography – the romanticisation of the past went hand in hand with its increasing commodification through the medium of photography.  Forbes quoted Benjamin in saying that ‘the truth of an object is only visible in its destruction’.  This discussion of destruction led us on nicely to Francis McKee’s paper.

Francis McKee offered us a discussion based on his current interest in the internet, modern ruins and their relationship to photography. McKee illustrated his talk with images of modern ruins from internet sites to demonstrate their increasingly popularity as an ‘internet genre’.

He spoke about the ruin as a modern invention that we humans have a great unspoken excitement and fascination with.  His talk looked at various artists who have been inspired by ruins, from writers who remarked at the ‘dark and wonderful’ nature of the Blitz, to filmmakers who were inspired by bombed-down cities to make movies (known as ‘Rubble Films’).  He also analysed more recent examples of photographers who engaged with ruined sites such as Chernobyl, Beirut, Ground Zero and contemporary Detroit.  McKee rightly questioned why people are so interested in these types of ruins. Where is photography now?  And how is photography related to these sites?

 Figure 2

Figure 2: Getty Caption: ‘A milkman delivering milk in a London street devastated during a German bombing raid. Firemen are dampening down the ruins behind him.’  Photographer Fred Morley.

 Figure 3

Figure 3: Original film poster for Rubble Film, c, 1929, Man with a Movie Camera

 Figure 4

Figure 4: Michigan Central Train Station, Detroit. Image taken from the  Internet site Flikr

McKee argued that the ruin might be becoming a fetishised symbol for photographers as a reaction to hyper media.  Indeed as a photographer, I fully appreciate the temptation to document these ruins as they some how seem to encapsulate the past and present simultaneously.

The discussion ended on the somewhat depressing note that our experience of the city is becoming increasingly mediated, and that Art and photography still shape our imagination of the city.  Some say that the city is dead – yet McKee also suggested that maybe photography is dead.  Today, we occupy a whole new social way of taking and receiving photographs. Controversially McKee suggested that maybe this new currency is much more important than Fine Art Photography. Although this was a somewhat pessimistic point to end on, it is a challenge for us photographers to grapple and engage with…

Caroline Douglas

Caroline Douglas is an artist based in Glasgow who predominantly works with photograpy. She was Artist in Residence at Stills Gallery in Edinburgh in 2008. She graduated in 2006.